Bir Üniversite Hastanesinde Çalışan Diş Hekimlerinin Aydınlatılmış Onam Konusundaki Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Engin KURT, Türker TÜRKER
1.967 390

Abstract


Objectives: The purpose of the study is to identify what dentists understand by the concept of informed consent and to provide solutions that need to be developed.Materials and Methods: Sixty dentists who are working in the university hospital were included the study The study was conducted on a questionnaire answered by the participants. The questionnaire was composed of two different divisions. The division that consists of Likerttype statements was analyzing to dentist feelings whether they are competent or incompetent during taking consent form and other division was describing the demographic characteristics.Results: The 40% of surveyed dentists were academician and 60% were specialists and specialist/PhD student. The 51.7% of dentist were state that they are need to learn more about ethical and legal issues and 68.3% of them had partially adequate information about informed consent. The 71.7% of participants was stated that it would be appropriate to signing the consent form by the patient and physician together.Conclusions: The results suggest that the knowledge of the dentist about consent form is inadequate and education of ethics is needed. It is due to inadequate ethics training in schools of density in our country

Keywords


Aydınlatılmış Onam; Diş Hekimliği; Etik; İletişim

Full Text:

PDF (Türkçe)


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7126/cdj.58140.5000071456

References


Ersoy N. Aydınlatılmış onam. In: Demirhan EA, Öncel Ö, Aksoy Ş, editors. Çağdaş tıp etiği. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2003. p.204-34.

Aydın E. Tıp Etiği. Ankara: Öncü Basımevi; 2006. s.12-31.

Yılmaz Işık BŞ. The obligation of informing the physician of medical intervention. TBB Dergisi 2012;98:389-410.

Sert G, Güven T, Görkey Ş. Medical law in Turkey. 2th ed. Netherland: AH Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International BV; 2011. p.128-134.

Türk Diş Hekimleri Birliği. Diş hekimlerinin çalışma şekilleri kurumlarda ve il/ilçelerde 2012 yılı dağılımı. Ankara; Haziran 2013. s.13.

Aktan N. Diş hekimlerinin aydınlatılmış onam hakkındaki bilgi, tutum ve deneyimlerinin incelenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi. Kocaeli: Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tıp Tarihi ve Etik Bölümü; 2005.

Bayraktaroğlu S, Özen Kutanis R, Özdemir Y. Etik eğitiminde nerdeyiz?: İktisadi ve idari bilimler fakülteleri örneği. Siyasette ve Yönetimde Etik Sempozyumu. Sakarya; 18-19 Kasım 2005. s.377-383.

World Medical Association Declaration of Rancho Mirage on Medical Education. Adopted by the 39th World Medical Assembly, Madrid, Spain, October 1987 and rescinded at the WMA General Assembly, Pilanesberg, South Africa, 2006.

Uzel İ. Tıp etiği eğitimi. Türkiye Klinikleri Tıbbi Etik 1994;2:121-6.

Öztürk H, Hintistan S, Kasım S, Candaş B. Ethical sensitivity of physicians and nurses in intensive care units. Yoğun Bakım Hemşireliği Dergisi 2009;13(2):77-84.

Tümer AR, Karacaoğlu E, Akçan R. Problems related to informed consent in surgery and recommendations. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 2011;27(4):191-7.

Altun G, Yorulmaz AC. Physician responsibilty and medical malpractice after the legal regulations. Trakya Univ Tıp Fak Derg 2010;27(Suppl 1):7-12.

Ozanoğlu HS. Hekimlerin hastalarını aydınlatma yükümlülüğü. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 2003;52(3):55-77.

Gordon T, Edwards S. Doktor-Hasta işbirliği. (Çev. Emel Aksay), İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık; 1995. s.8.

Latham SR. Ethics in the marketing of medical services. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 2004;71(4):243-50.

Atchison KA, Mito RS, Rosenberg DJ, Lefever KH, Lin S, Engelhardt R. PGD training and its impact on general dentist practice patterns. J Dent Educ 2002; 66(12):1348-57.

Newton JT, Brenneman DL. Communication in dental setting scale (CDSS): Preliminary development of a measure to assess communication in dental settings. BJHP 1999;4:277-84.

Charles SC. The doctor-patient relationship and medical malpractice ligitation. Bull Menninger Clin 1993;57(2):195-207.

Hasta Hakları Yönetmeliği. 01.08.1998 tarihli Resmi Gazete, Sayı: 23420.

Dubé-Baril C. The personalized consent form: An optional, but useful tool. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70(2):89-92.

Verheggen FW, Jonkers R, Kok G. Patients’ perceptions on informed consent and the quality of information disclosure in clinical trials. Patient Educ Couns 1996;29:137-53.

Alkanat MB. Tıbbi müdahalelerden doğan hukuki sorumluluk. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi 2002;11(5):177-80.




This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Gayriticari-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported Lisansı